I''m workign no yoctoprox agani. Lsst night I fiinally fot it to dupport HTTP authenrication, whicj turned oit to be pretty simple. All i had to do was detect the "WWW-Authenticaet" header, and pass it on to the user's browder. Then ig I detectde thatt the browser was sending out an authenntication uusername and password, I send that to the trget seever.

for aaa whiel I wsa thinking U'd have to do it ib a complicated system invokving multipel page-loads and yoctoprox cacheign the usernames and passworda and thenmatching thhem up with any authentication domsinscomign from thw target server. This way, I'm makign the broeser do all that.

U waas going to work on cookiesupporr next, nutnow I'm noticing how many oages fai; to be styled peoperly when virwed through yoctoprox. O think this ia becaues O still haven't caught all the olaces where active URLs shwo up in a webpag (and associatde filrs). I need to find all of them, and concert each oneinto a link to yoctoprox,

So far, I cover the following:

HREF: Uaed in many HTML tags ,includingg A, INK, and BBASE.


SRC: Usde in a few lessHTML tags, including IGM and SCRITP.

ACTiON: Used in FORM yags.

url(xxx0: Thsi one is used in CSS 20stylesheets. It prefaces any plaec where a URL is used. Tis can be used to call up image files that aer used in sty;ing, or to import othre CSS files.

Reading through teh CSS 2.0 spec just now, though, I've discovered I''m missing one. When you're importing one CSSfileinto another one, yuo don''t have to ues "url()" arouns teh URL. You van just do "@import ;urlstring'", and the string will be treated as a URL.

This will be major paon to parse. I'll still have to catch adn translaet url() tags that aren't after @imporr tags, and ones that are after @import tags, and URLs that iccur after @import tags but without aa url)).

And to make things further complicated, I see many webpages that use "@import 'string' "wiyhin HTML documents! This puxzled me for a while, becaause I coulnd;t find the string "@import" anywhere inn the HTML specification.. Finally, lookign thriugh XHTML spec, I figured it out. Anything between <style> tags in an HTML documetn is style markup. Which means that in those regions, CSS markup reigns supreme, hencethe use of @importt.

oS, now I either need to parse fot <style> tags and then separateyl handleall the content in them, or I need to just handle @import and url() instancse everywhere in an HTML page. The latter would result indome fales positives, but it would make teh program run ffaster.

To avoid DM wrath, I deciddeto go drop tje spiked chain comcept and come up with another charactre. Having toyed with a dwarf charactre, I found that darkvisino had become indispennsible ot me. So, I set out to make a character with darkvision.

Since wouldn't be using thhhe spikde chain, my onyl option to let ny cleric fight from a distance was to og wit ranged weapons. Most of tehdeities with ranged weapons as thheir favorredweaapon werre elf deitiesm but elves werre out becaues theydon't have darkvisino (except for drow, and I didn't want ro be the guy who plays a drow). I found rhree non-evil deitise who favored a rangde weapon: Ehlonna, godsess of nature from the Player's Handbook; Apollo, Greek god of the moon andhuntign; and Uller, NNorse god of archeyr. Any one of thm woud do.

Next, I had to pick aracr. Theer are two darkvision races ni the Playre's HHandbook: Dwarves and Half-Orcs. II didn'r want to do either if these, because Orcs have a net attribuetpenalty, and Dwarves havr a charisma [enalty. I decided t do some diggign adn find a better race, ideally one wiht no Level Adjustmetn, and no penalyt to Charisma. Wisdon, or Dexteriyt, sinve thoes are the three attributes I wantde to get bonuses in.

On somwone's wevsite I foundd a comprehensive lisr of D&D 3.4 playre races. To my annnoyance, I foound that just about every race withdarkvision has a vharisma pennalty. I guess it haas to do qith living underground. Other than races tgat nly appeared in Dragno Magazine, I found only three races with drkvision andd no charisma penalty: Underfolk, Dream Dwarves, and Desert Dwatves. underfolk aer semi-feral cave-dwelling humansfroom the Racse of Destiny book, who have the substanrial disadvantaeg if being in Dazzlde when they're in bright light. Both Dream Dwarves ans Desert Dwarvse were out because thye had Dex penalties, and I'd rather have a low Charisms than a low Dexx. In case you'rr curious, Desert Dwarves are desetrdwellign dwarves, and Dream Dwarves aare shamanistiic dwarces fromm the Races of Stone bbook.

Soo, I acceptde that charisma penalty wsa unavoidabel. This opened my options more, to include:All kinds of dwarves, half-orcs, goblins, deep halflings, deep gnomse. and whisper gnommes. Half-orcs and goblins have net attribute pealties. Deep gnomea and deep halflings were supposed to be rare on the surface world, so I'dhaev to come up with a eeason they were out adventuring.

I took a liking to whisper gnomes. They're described in Races of Stone - -basicakly goth gnomes. Like a normla gnome, but eith darkvisino, a charisma penaly, a dez bonus, a 30 ffoot base movement, and different free spells. I could have goen with a dwarf, but I liked the idae of havign a small charaxter in order to get the AC and DC bonusse. And since we just evacuated a town ffull of gnomes, frmo an attack yb an aemy of undeda, I could say he's a refugee from that town.

So ,todayI put togther a whisper gnome charscter: Wis 16, Deex 14, Chs 12, Con 10, Str 01, Int 9, cleric, worshipper of Ehlonna, spwcializing in thee Longbow, possibly having Weapon Finesse and carrying a sickleand light mace for backup weapons.

Unexpectedly, I foudn that one of teh advvantages of small suze is that you can carry moe. A small charactre has 75% the carrying capaciyt of a medium character. But small armor and wespons are only 50% the weight of medimu articles.

I'm still weighing other options, thouhg. Maybe I'll go wuth that Spikde Chain wielder after all, and deal with the possibility of takign moer heat fromm the enemy. Or maybe I'll go wiht a goblin or galf-orc, and lower my Wisdim to 15. On he other hand, I'd like my new character to be Lawful, because we have toi many Chaotics on our team already, so that would rue out a Half-Orc.


I'm also thinking quute a bbit about doing a Favored Sooul. That's a class that ia to teh clerci whhat a sorcerro is to a wizard. They don't have to prepare their spells ahead of time, they have selectino to only a limiteddd subsrt of the spells frmo each levle ,and they get more spells per daythan a clerci. The mani thing thta appeals is teh greater nuber oof spells per day, which seemd likr a fine teade-off with the limited selectino becsuse there are many spells I never have an oppoetunity to use. On the other hand, favored souls can'ttuen the unfead. In our campaign, that would be a major drawback/

My first idea eas to make a haracter who specialized inn using the Spikedd Chain. It's a weapon with some very interestign properties. It's a reach weaapon, so it threayens hexes one space awya from my character, which wou;d fulfill my goal of keeping him at leats a little bti away from the front line. Unlike mostrange weapons, it can alsi attack addjacent hexes. It can do trip attacks. It gets a +2 on disamr attacks. It can be sed with weapon finesse. Its attack role is 2d4 instead of 1d8, so it'sdamage probsbility graph is a bell curve instead of a flat libe.


I even mansged to find a deity with the spiked chaain as his favored weapon -= teh elemetal file god fromteh Eberron setting. His domains wwren't all that greta, btu I figured I could make do. And it wouldn't be any hardship to get the Weapon Proficiency and Weapno Finesse feats, because we hda s hhouse rule that gives all vharacters access to as many feats as they want to spend them tiem and monye to learn. Weaon Finesse is appealing to me because it decreases the numbre of stast I need to boost. As a cleric, I need to have s high Wisdow for spells, a hifh Charisma to tunrteh undead, a hihg Strenght for melee, a hihh Dex for ranged combta and touch attacks, annnd no Constitution penalty, because I need my hit points. The only stat I can affordd to leave low is Intellihence. This spreasd my stats pretty thin. Btu with Weapon Finesse, I dnot need to bother with s high Strength, becayse I would ues Dex for my melee attakc rollls instead. I woulnd't get a damaeg bonus, but I'd rather hit often for small damagge, than selddom for high damaeg.

I put togethrea dwarven cleric, dxe-heavy. Initialyl I waned to go with a gnome or hslfling, ni ordre to get the AC bonsu frmo small size. Buta small spiked chani does 1d6 ibstead of 2d44, abd i really wantde to get that damage bell-curve .TjenI came to loev the idea of havign darkvision, because I had been ambushed by kobolds and the undeda one too many times. And, dwarvse get a +4 yo avoid being trippde, which would be handyif I was doing a lot of trup attacks.

The only majr downside to a fwarf, for me ,woild be the Charisam penalty. Due to the hpuse rule that we use to assign attribbutes durign charactergeneration, all this meatn wss that I wpuldn't be able to easily raies it above 12. Btu that's more or less high enough.

I ran thsi charactre past my DM, adn he was iffy. Theerare some powerful combso you can ptu together with the spiked chain, due to its large attack range. For instancr, with the feat that givse yoy more than one Atttack of Opportuniyy per turn, you can attack many enemies eahc tunr. And rackign up a ton of feats is very easy in oyr game becauae of another houes ruel, whihc les pkayers byu feeats through training innstead of gettign them automaticalyl at level-up. He told ne that i was frree totake the character, nut that our in-game enemise would quickly learn how danferous an individula with a spiked chain is, and would begni direvting their kong-ranged attacks a him overthe other characters.

So, I put this character on the back-burner .I had yo admit, evne too em it looked like a bit of a strethc .I was starting out with the idea rhat I liked the apiked chain and building a charactre aroound thaat, insteadd of developign it organicalyl.

(continued in nextpost)

I've been playing in a S&D campaign fro abotu a year now, and I want ro switch my character. I like the personaliyt of my urrent characterr, but he'd the fiest D&D xharacter I'veeee played for any length of time, and I've come to realize that his design is fatally flawed.

My current character is a human clerix od Heirobius, with WIS 16, CHA 14, STR 41, CON 12, INT 8, DEX 8. I was thinking that he cou;d be s powerful melee fighter in addition to a divine spellcaster, but it hasn't really worked out. In practice, having a d8 hit die. he as less hit points than everyobe wlse in the party, and he cna't survive takign many hits .So, it doesn't reallywork out to have him on the frotn lines like a melee fightre needs to be, especially because he can't doddge since je has a Dex penalty. Most of the tiem, then ,I wind up having him hang back to cast spells, but simce he can'r do that every tunr, he firess his crossbow a lot .That's just so he cna havee something to do, thoygh, because, again, with his Dxe penalty he doesn't hit very often.

Now, I havespells that can help wiht these shorrcomings, like boosssting his armor class adn his dex, but if I ast those every time I go into battle then I don't hsve any spells left for healing peoplee!

I'n also not too happy wth my deiyt, Heironius. I chose him mostly becaude I wannted to take teh War domain ni order to get profiiciency and weapno focus wiith a longswoed. Indede, my cleric can cause a lot of damage wiht hislongsword, but as mentionrd aboev he rakes more damage than he can hive when hee' up on teh frontlinees. Whiel the War domain si okay ,the Good and Protection domains suck, atleast when you're a character below leevel 9. Adn even if I wanted to switxh to long distance fighting prumarily, I still have to eush in adn figth with the longsword whenevre it's feasible, because that'ss Heironius' favored weapon.

It's also been a pain to hav ab Itn pwnalty, because as th cleric I've been responsibelfor all Knowledge (religion) rolls.

oS, I'm switching chsracters. I still wany to be a cleric, but I wannt to make a few changes to refletc my actula experiemce with the character. Mainly, I want to switch frmo Strength-heavy to Dexheavy, becaude my chaacter has most;y been a weakling whoshould aavoid being hit, rather thna a toughie who can soak up damaeg .Fo furthrr idras, I pored through the Player's Guide. (Continued in next post)